![best lag switch program best lag switch program](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/4VBo02HcyF8/mqdefault.jpg)
i have a list but wanted to make sure i have covered everything Thanks HI Everyonei am in the process of leading the IT side of an office relocation and wanted to get everyone's viewpoint on what things to consider.
BEST LAG SWITCH PROGRAM UPDATE
Windows 10's 21H2 feature update is now available for all users and it looks to heavily focus on security.
BEST LAG SWITCH PROGRAM WINDOWS 10
Windows 10 21H2 now in broad deployment, available to everyone
![best lag switch program best lag switch program](https://blurbusters.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/blur-busters-gsync-101-bitsum-parkcontrol-program.png)
such as running between buildings), or running near large EM fields then fiber has its technical benefits. If your switch to switch needs to span more than 100m, or you need electrical isolation between the switches (i.e. I would just use 2 copper ports and make a MLT between the two switches next to each other. In this case there is no technical benefit to using fiber over copper.
BEST LAG SWITCH PROGRAM SERIES
The SG300 series are best as an access layer switch and not in the distribution layer if you want redundancy.Īs for the difference between fiber and copper for switches right next to each other. I hate to say it, but you have the wrong switches for what you are trying to do. The sg500 series can be stacked where they appear as one switch and you can create LAGs across the switches in the stack. In case of the SG350s no you can not create a distributed multi link trunk across two independent switches. Sorry for being so wordy, and thank y'all for your help.īethHere wrote:The question: is it possible to use ports from two separate switches in a daisy-chained configuration to create a LAG?
![best lag switch program best lag switch program](https://static.cracked.io/uploads/avatars/avatar_613448.gif)
If not, we could use a copper LAG between 2 regular ports on each switch. The question: is it possible to use ports from two separate switches in a daisy-chained configuration to create a LAG? Second switch in daisy chain: port 25 is the other half of the LAG to building 2, ports 26 and 27 LAG to building 3, and port 28 connects to the second redundant network. That is a total of eight SFP ports, but, in order to use fiber for all connections, one of the LAGs would have to be split across ports in the daisy-chained pairs:įirst switch in daisy chain: ports 25 and 26 LAG to building 1, port 27 connects to second switch in the daisy chain, port 28 is one-half of a LAG to building 2. Here's the problem: To use fiber for all inter-switch connections, I'd need one SFP from each switch to daisy chain to its partner, one SFP to connect the daisy-chained pairs between redundant networks, and 2 each to LAG to the other 3 areas on campus.
![best lag switch program best lag switch program](https://i.imgur.com/6UWu7jH.png)
I had planned to use 2 linked SFPs to connect from the main switches to the other locations, and fiber to daisy chain one switch to the other on each network. We plan to use fiber to connect to additional SG350-28 switches (not daisy chained, FWIW) at three separate points on campus. Since we don't have stacking switches, we plan to daisy-chain two switches together for each network (we need to connect to more ports than one switch would allow). We have two redundant networks set up, called A and B. We have four Cisco SG350-28 port switches.